0001
Sunday June 14t.
0002
Appendix or Endnote
0005
(1
0006
English original of Auden's
0007
Speech delivered in German at Neulengbach , 2? of May 1970
0008
Need exact
0009
date of
0010
Speech
0011
Who
0012
typed
0013
this´
0014
eg:
0015
whose
0016
punctu
0017
is
0018
it
0019
Sehr vee hrter Herr Landeshauptmann,meine Damen und Herren:
0020
I hope you will pardon me if I speak somewhat personally. I do so,
0021
not out of vanity,but bec ause I do not wish to give the impression that I
0022
am attempting to lay down absolute laws which are valid for all. I give you my
0023
experiences as a poet,in the hope that you will be able to compare the m with
0024
yours ,and form your own judgment about them.
0025
Most of what I know about the writing of poetry,or at least about the kind I
0026
am interested in writing,I discovered long before I took any interest in poetry
0027
itself.
0028
Between the ages of six and twelve,I spent a great many of my waking hours in
0029
the fab rication of a private secondary sacred world,the basic elements of which
0030
were a) a limestone landscape mainly derived from the Pennine Moors in the
0031
North of England and b) an industry - lead-mining.
0032
It is no doubt psychologically significant that my sacred world was autistic -
0033
that is to say,I had no wish to share it with others no r could I have done so.
0034
However,though constructed for and inhabited by myself alone,I needed the help of
0035
others,my parents1/2 in particular,in collecting its basic materials; others had to
0036
procure for me the necessary text-books on geology and machinery,maps,catalog ues,
0037
guide-books and photographs,and,when occasion offered ta ke me down real mines,
0038
tasks which they performed with unfailing patience and generosity.
0039
From this activity,I learned certain principles which I was later to find applied
0040
to all artistic fabrication. First,whatever other elements it may include,the
0041
initial impulse to create a secondary world is a feeling of awe aroused by
0042
encounters,in the Primary World,with sacred beings or events. This feeling of awe
0043
is an imperative,that is to´ say,one is not free to choose the object or the event
0044
that arouses it. Though every work of art is a secondary world,it cannot be
0045
constructed ex nihilo,but is a selection from and a recombination of the contents of
0046
the Primary World. Even the 'purest' poem,in the French Symboliste sense,is
0047
made of words which are not the poet's private property,but the communal creation
0048
of the linguistic group to whom he belongs,so that their meaning can be looked up
0049
in a dictionary.
0050
Secondly,in constructing my private world,I discovere d that,though this was
0051
a game,or rather precisely because it was a game - that is to say,not a necessity
0052
like eating or sleeping,but something I was free to do or not as I chose - it
0053
could not be played without rules. Absolute freedom is meaningless: freedom can
0054
only be realised in a choice between alternati ves. A secondary world,be it a poem,
0055
or a game of football or bridge,must be as much a world of law as the Primary,the
0056
only difference being that in the world of games one is free to decide what its
0057
laws shall be. But to all games as to real life,Goethe's lines apply.
(vl) 0001 In der Beschränkung zeigt sich erst der Meister,
(vl) 0002 Und d
as Gesetz nur kann uns Freiheit geben.
0058
Check
0059
Quote
0060
and give exact
0061
source if
0062
possible
0063
As regards my particu lar lead-mining world,I decided,or rather,without conscious
0064
decision I instinctively felt,that I must impose two restrictions upon my freedom
0065
of fantasy. In choosing what objects were to be included,I was free to select this
0066
and reject that,on condition that both were real objects in the Primary World,to
0067
choose,for example,between two kinds of water-turbine,which could be found in a
0068
text-book on mining machinery or a manufacturer's catalogue: but I was not free
0069
to invent one. In deciding how my world was to function,I could choose between
0070
t wo practical possibilit ies - a mine can be drained either by an adit or a pump -
0071
but physic al impossibili ties and magic means were forbidden. When I say forbidden,
0072
I mean that I felt,in some obscure way,that they were morally forbidden. Then there
0073
came a day when the moral issue became quite conscious. As I was planning my
0074
Platonic Idea of a concentrating-mill,I ran into difficulties. I had to choose
0075
between two types of a cer tain machine for separating the slimes,called a buddle.
0076
One type I found more sacred or ' beautiful',but the other type was,I
0077
knew from my reading,the more efficient. At this point I realised that it was my
0078
moral duty to sacrifice my aesthetic preference to reality or truth.
0079
(2
0080
When,later,I began to write poetry’I found that,for me,at least,the same
0081
obligation was binding. That is to say,I cannot accept the do ctrine that,in
0082
poetry,there is a 'suspension of belief '. A poet must never make a statement
0083
simply because it sounds poetically exciting: he must also bel ieve it to be
0084
true. This does not mean,of course,that one can only appreciate a poet whose
0085
beliefs happen to co-incide with one's own. It does mean,however,that one must
0086
be convinced that the poet really believ es what he says,however odd the
0087
belief may seem to oneself.
0088
Change colon to
0089
semi-colon ?
0090
Between constructing a private yfantasy world for oneself alone
0091
and writing poetry,there is,of course,a profound difference. A
0092
fantasy world exists only in the head of its creator: a poem is a public
0093
verbal object intended to be read and enjoyed by others. To become conscious
0094
of others is to become conscious of historical time in various ways. The
0095
contents of a poem are necessarily past experiences,and the goal of
0096
a poem is necessarily in the future,since it cannot be read until
0097
it has been written. Again,to write a poem is to engage in an activity which
0098
human beings have practised for centuries. If one asks why human beings
0099
make poems or paint pictures or compose music,I can see two possible answers.
0100
Firstly all the artistic media are forms of an activity pecul iar to human
0101
beings,namely,Personal Speech. Many animals have impersonal codes of
0102
communications,visual,olfactory,auditory signals,b y which they convey to
0103
other members of their species vital information about food,territory,sex,
0104
the presence of enemies,etc,and in social animals like the bee,such
0105
a code may be exceedingly comple x. We,too,of course,often use words in the same
0106
way,as when I ask a stranger the way to the railroad station. But when we
0107
truly speak,we do something quite different. We speak as person to person
0108
in order to disclose ourselves to others and share our experiences with
0109
them,not because we must,but becuase we enjoy doing so. This activity is
0110
sometimes quite erroneously called 'self-expression'. If I write a poem
0111
about experiences I have had,I do so because I think it
0112
should be of interest and value to others : the fact that it has till now
0113
only been my exper ience is accidental. What the poet or any artist has to convey
0114
is a perception of a reality common to all,but seen from a unique perpsective,
0115
which it is his duty as well as his pleasure to share with others. To small
0116
truths as well as great,St Augustine's words apply.
0117
Change colon
0118
to
0119
semi.colon ?
0120
0121
Change colon to
0122
semi.colon ?
0123
The truth is neither mine nor his nor another's;but belongs
0124
to us all whom Thou callest to partake of it: warning us
0125
terribly,not to account it private to ourselves,lest we be
0126
deprived of it.
0127
Check quote
0128
and
0129
give
0130
source if possible
0131
Why is this passage
0132
underlined ?
0133
Then the second impulse to artistic fabrication is the desire to transcend
0134
our mortality,by making objects which,unlike ourselves,are not subject to
0135
natural death,but can remain permanently 'on hand' in the world,
0136
long after we and our society have perished.
0137
Every genuine work of art,I believe,exhibits two qualities,Nowness and
0138
Permanence. By Nowness I mean the quality which enables an art-historian
0139
to date a work,at least,approximately. If,for example,one listens to
0140
a composition by Palestrina and one by Mozart,one knows immediately that,
0141
quite aside from their artistic merits,Palestrina must have lived earlier
0142
than Mozart: he could not possibly have written as he did after Mozart.
0143
By Perman ence,I mean that the work continues to have relevance and
0144
importance lomg after its creator is dead. In the history of Art,unlike
0145
the history of Science,no genuine work of art is made obsolete by a
0146
later work. Past science is of interest only to the historian of science,not
0147
to what scientists are doing at this moment. Past works of art,on the
0148
other hand,are of the utmost importance to the contemporary
0149
practic t neroner. Every artist tries to produce something new,but in the hope
0150
that,in time,it will take its proper place in the tradition of his art.
0151
And he cannot produce anything significantly original unless he knows
0152
well what has already been done;w ,that is to say , he cannot
0153
'rebel' against the past without having a profound reverence for it.
0154
Change colon ?
0155
(3
0156
There are periods in history when the arts develop uninterruptedly,
0157
each generation building on the achievements of the previous generation.
0158
There are other periods when radical breaks seem to be necessary. However,
0159
when they are,one will generally find that the 'radical' artist does not
0160
disown the past,but finds in works of a much earlier period or in
0161
those of culture than his own,the clue as to what he should do now.
0162
In my own case,for example,I know how much I owe to Anglo-Saxon and
0163
Medie val Poetry.
0166
When I review the contemporary artistic scene,it strikes me how
0167
extraordinarily fortunate men like Stravinsky,Picasso,Eliot,
0168
etc,that is,those persons we think of as the founders of 'modern' art,
0169
were in being born when they were,so that they came to manhood before
0170
I9I4. Until the ,western society was still pretty much First World War
0171
what it had been in the nineteenth century. This meant that for these artists,
0172
the felt need to create something new arose from an artistic imperative,
0173
not a historic imperative. No one asked himself: 'What is the proper
0174
kind of music to compose or picture to paint or poem to write in the year
0175
I9I2.? ' Secondly,their contemporary audiences were mostly
0176
cons ervative,but honestly so. Those,for instance,who were scandalised by
0177
Le Sacre du Printemps,may seem to us now to have been old fogies,but
0178
their reaction was genuine. They did not say to themselves: 'Times have
0179
changed and we must change with them in order not to
0180
be left behind. '
0181
Here are a few statements by Stravinsky to which the young, whether
0182
artists or critics,would do well to listen and ponder over.
0183
In my youth the new music grew out of,and in reaction to,traditions,
0184
whereas it appears to be evolving to-day as much from social needs
0185
as interior artistic ones...The status of new music as a
0186
category is another incomparable. It had none at all in my early
0187
years,being in fact categorically opposed,and often with real
0188
hostility. But the unsuccess of composers o f my generation at
0189
least kept them from trading on success,and our unsuccess may have
0190
been less insidious than the automatic superlatives which nowadays
0191
kill the new by absorbing it ta o deth.
0192
***
0193
Again : Why are
0194
all these
0195
passages
0196
underlined ?
0197
Check and
0198
give
0199
source if possible
0200
The use of the new hardware naturally appears to the new musician
0201
as 'historically imperative '; but music is made out of musical
0202
imperatives,and the awareness of historical processes is probably
0203
best left to future and different kinds of wage-earners.
0204
***
0205
Check and
0206
give
0207
source .
0208
In times,like our own,of rapid social change and political crisis,there is
0209
always a danger of confusing the principles governing political action and
0210
those governing artistic fabrication. The most important of such confus ions
0211
are thr ee.
0212
Firstly,one may come to think of artistic fabrication as a f orm of political
0213
action. Every citizen, poets includ ed,has a duty to be politically engagé ,
0214
that is,to play a responsible part in seeing that the society of which
0215
he is a member shall function properly and improve. But the poet,qua poet,
0216
has only one political function. Since lang uage is his medium,it is his duty,
0217
by his own example,to defend his mothermother-tongue against corruption by demagogues,
0218
journalists,the mass-media,etc. As Karl Kraus said: 'Die Sprache ist die
0219
Mutter,nicht das Magd,des ',and when language loses its meaning, Gedankens
0220
its place is taken by violence. Of course,the poet may use political and
0221
social events as subject-matter for poems - they are as much a part of human
0222
experience as love or nature - but he must never imagine that his poems have
0223
the power to affect the course of history. The political and social history
0224
of Europe would be what it has been if Dante,Shakepeare,Goethe,Micha
0225
Angelo, elTit, ianMozart,Beethoven,e tc, had never existed.
0229
4
0230
Where political and social evils are concerned,only
0231
t wo things are effective: political action and straightforward,truthful,
0232
detailed journalistic rapportage of the facts. The Arts are powerless.
0233
The second confusion,of which Plato is the most famous example,is to take
0234
arti stic fabrication as the model for a good society.
0235
Such a model,if put into practice,is bound to produce a tyranny The aim of
0236
the artist is to produce an object which is complete and will endure without
0237
change. In the 'city' of a poem,there are always the same inhabitants doing
0238
exactly the same jobs for ever. A society which was really like a good poem,
0239
embodying the aesthetic virtues of order,economy,and subordination of the detail
0240
to the whole,would be a nightmare of horror for,given the historical reality of
0241
actual men,such a society could only come into being through selective breeding,
0242
ex termination of the physically and mentally unfit,absolute obedience to
0243
its director,a large slave cla ss kept out of sight in cellars,and the
0244
strictest censure ship of the Arts,forbidding anything to be said which is
0245
out of keeping with the official 'line '.
0246
The third confusion,typical of our western 'free'
0247
societies at this time,is the opposite of Plato's,namely to take political
0248
act ion as the model for arti stic fabrication. Political action is a necessity,
0249
that is to say,a t every moment something has to be done,and it
0250
is momentary - action at this moment is immediately followed by another action
0251
at the next. Artistic fabrication,on the other hand,is voluntary-
0252
the alternative to one work of art can be no work of art - and the artistic
0253
object is permanent,that is to say,immune to historical change. The attempt
0254
to model arti stic fabrication o n political action can therefore,only
0255
reduce it to momentary a nd arbitrary 'happenings',a conformism with
0256
the tyrrany of the immediate moment which is far more enslaving and
0257
destructive of integrity than any conformism with past tradition.
0260
What then,can the Arts do for us? In my opi nion,they can do two things.
0261
They can,as Dr Johns said,'enable us a little better to enjoy life or a on
0262
little better to endure it '. And, because they are objects
0263
permanently on hand in the world,they are the chief means by which the
0264
living are able to break bread with the dead,and,without a communication
0265
with the dead,I do not believe that a fully human civilised life is possible.
0266
Perhaps,too,in our age,the mere making of a work of art is itself a
0267
political act. So long as artists exist,making what they please or think
0268
they ought to make,even if their wor ks are not terribly good,they
0269
remind the Management of something managers need to be reminded of,namely,
0270
that the managed are people with faces,not anonymous numbers,that Homo
0271
Laborans is also Homo Ludens.
0272
Source ?
0273
And now,I hope those of you who know no English will forgive me i f
0274
I conclude these remarks with a light poem of my own,entitled
0275
Doggerel by a Senior Citizen (see CP 638-9).
0276
I have added commas in lists after final item and before etc
0277
since they are already there in most of the lists -
0278
I have also added a few other comma[] (usually to complete a set of parenthetical commas)
0279
I have no[] changed colons though I would like to : Are these A's ?
0280
(4a
0281
insert into preceding page
0282
At this p oint,a little digression on the subject of 'free' verse,which
0283
seems now to be almost universal among young poets. Though excellent
0284
examples,the poems of D.H.Lawrence,for example,exist,i they are,in my opinion
0285
the exception,not the rule. The great virtue of formal metrical rules is
0286
that they forbid automatic resp onses and,by forcing the poet
0287
to have second thoughts,free him f rom the fetters of self. All too often,the
0288
result of not having a fixed form to be true to,is a self-indulgence which in
0289
the detached reader can only cause boredom. Further,in my exper ience ,contrary
0290
to what one might exp ect,the free-verse poets sound much more
0291
like each other than those who write in fixed forms. Whatever freedom may do,
0292
it does not,it would seem,make for originality.